Food and Health
Acid rain is back, and thanks to farming, worse than ever
Acid rain is back, and thanks to farming, worse than ever
Policy makers, environmentalists—even Republicans—like to congratulate themselves on the “victory” over acid rain. As this American success story is usually told, acid rain’s effects were addressed by a 1990 update to the Clean Air Act that created a cap-and-trade system focused on sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. Since the system was implemented, sulfur dioxide emissions dropped 70 percent, and threatened forests and wildlife were saved. Hurrah!
by Tom Laskawy.
Policy makers, environmentalists—even Republicans—like to congratulate themselves on the “victory” over acid rain. As this American success story is usually told, acid rain’s effects were addressed by a 1990 update to the Clean Air Act that created a cap-and-trade system focused on sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. Since the system was implemented, sulfur dioxide emissions dropped 70 percent, and threatened forests and wildlife were saved. Hurrah!
There’s only one problem with that version of history: It’s not true. As Scientific American reports, acid rain is a continuing and growing problem; forests and animals all over the world (including the U.S. East Coast) are indeed facing catastrophe. But the No. 1 source of today’s acid rain pollution is no longer sulfur dioxide, as it was 20 years ago. It’s nitrogen oxide emissions from factory farms.
Some of the following will be familiar to those diligent readers of Grist’s Nitrogen series:
Part of the problem dates back to WWI, when two German scientists invented the Haber–Bosch process, which took nonreactive nitrogen from the air (N2) and converted it into reactive, usable ammonia (NH3). Most of the nitrogen harvested via this process has been used in fertilizers, and the runoff from farms has created dead zones in Chesapeake Bay and at the mouths of the Columbia and Mississippi rivers. Some efforts have been made to regulate the agricultural nitrogen runoff, but atmospheric emissions of agricultural ammonia remain virtually unrestricted.
Agri-ammonia vapors also derive from concentrated animal feeding operations in the U.S. South. The gas rises into the air and is deposited dry or in rainfall where in the ground bacteria breaks it into nitrogen and nitric acid, which can kill fish and plants. “Agriculture is increasingly functioning as an intensively managed industrial operation, and that is creating serious water, soil, and air problems,” says Viney Aneja, a professor at North Carolina State University in Raleigh.
It’s an agricultural double-whammy: emissions produced as a consequence of fertilizer runoff AND livestock emissions both caused by our chemically intensive and highly industrialized food production system. And all the more difficult to control since agricultural sources are the largest, but by no means the only, contributor: power plants and automobiles also emit nitrogen oxides.
It’s perhaps even a triple threat since, as Scientific American explains, the nitric-acid rain that results from all these sources damages the soil on which it falls by leaching out important nutrients. Research has also found that nitrogen deposited through acid rain has the effect of promoting growth of some species while suppressing others, thus reducing biodiversity in the wild. Finally, the nitric acid ultimately “liberates” toxic minerals from the ground, which then in turn poison wildlife. In short, the real story of acid rain is an American tragedy.
As we documented in February, the dangers we face from the indiscriminate use of nitrogen fertilizer, along with our unwillingness to properly regulate livestock factory farmers, are both numerous and grave. While the Europe Union (again!) has enacted laws that have successfully reduced nitrogen emissions by a third since 1999, U.S nitrogen emissions have stayed flat, while ammonia emissions have increased by over 25 percent.
The only answer is to approach nitrogen pollution, in all its forms and from all its sources, as seriously and as intensively as we did sulfur dioxide pollution back in the 1990s.
Related Links:
Supreme Court’s ruling on Monsanto’s GE alfalfa: Who won?
EPA Analysis: Rainforests Key to Climate Legislation Affordability, Integrity
One super-toxic chemical down, thousands more to go
World Green Top News
- Testing a New Dynamic Solar Facade
- Joshua Tree Gets a New Desert Prefab
- Community Solar Programs Let Renters Share The Power
- Ahead of Schedule, An LED Bulb for us All
- Simple Green Harpoon House in Oregon
- Dad Was Right About Those Lights
- Gary Chang's Sliding Wall Apartment Is An Eco-Friendly 24 Rooms! (VIDEO)
- Who Wins in the Home Star Program? GridPoint, Big Box Retailers
- Seeking Existing Home Energy Efficiency
- Smart Windows Automatically Adjust to Outdoor Temperature to Save Energy
3BL News
- New Drama Promotes Women's Rights in Mexico: Video Trailer 8 Feb 2012 | 8:42 am
- Pipeline Heat Project Recaptures Energy With Chevy’s Help 8 Feb 2012 | 8:30 am
- CR Leaders Corner: Witold Henisz 8 Feb 2012 | 8:13 am
- Newark Schools Receive IBM Technology Centers to Improve Children's Math, Science & Language Skills 8 Feb 2012 | 7:47 am
- Accountability-Central.com AC Alert for February 7, 2012 Is Cheaper Natural Gas Good for Our Environment? 8 Feb 2012 | 7:30 am

